When creating a new API controller in a Web Application the template code created if you choose to include read/write actions provides a good overview of how to pass values through to the API methods and return results.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be9d9/be9d9c5732ba7f31b877d17a53299bd67f92620e" alt=""
The template assumes that the controller only has one action per HTTP verb (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) and so if you try to add in another action with a different name for a verb you may get an AmbiguousActionException AmbiguousActionException: Multiple actions matched. The following actions matched route data and had all constraints satisfied:
. This can be seen in the below default code to which I’ve added a HelloWorld action for GET.
namespace ProductRatingApi.Controllers
{
[Produces("application/json")]
[Route("api/Values")]
public class ValuesController : Controller
{
// GET: api/Values
[HttpGet]
public IEnumerable<string> Get()
{
return new string[] { "value1", "value2" };
}
[HttpGet]
public string HelloWorld()
{
return "Hello World!";
}
// GET: api/Values/5
[HttpGet("{id}", Name = "Get")]
public string Get(int id)
{
return "value";
}
// POST: api/Values
[HttpPost]
public void Post([FromBody]string value)
{
}
// PUT: api/Values/5
[HttpPut("{id}")]
public void Put(int id, [FromBody]string value)
{
}
// DELETE: api/ApiWithActions/5
[HttpDelete("{id}")]
public void Delete(int id)
{
}
}
}
In this case, going to api/values produces an AmbiguousActionException error and api/values/helloworld maps to Get(int id)
as the routing treats the action name helloworld as the id parameter. Removing the Get(int id)
action results in a method not found exception. To map to these actions correctly we need to update the controller routing template to take account of controller name and action name like so.
[Route("api/[controller]/[action]")]
Action names now need to be stated explicitly in the URL but this means it’s possible to have more than one named action for a HTTP verb.
0 Comments